Per user preference: terse, physically-structured, no caveats. Organized by document, specs vs. measured values separated.

Source documents

  • 2405.13493v1 — Jahnke et al., "The Euclid NISP instrument" (A&A) — main reference, overview + as-built design
  • 2506.08378v2 — Gillard et al., "The NISP spectroscopy channel, on ground performance and calibration" (A&A) — ground PSF/spectro calibration
  • 2303.09130v1 — SPIE proc., NISP grism FM (LAM), grism WFE test campaign
  • aapg-2022-Trame_proposition_detaillee.docx — internal ANR/DISPERS proposal, summary-level, less authoritative for numbers than the peer-reviewed papers

1. Telescope

Item Value Type Source
Design Korsch off-axis TMA (three-mirror anastigmat) spec Jahnke+2024
Primary mirror diameter 1.20 m spec Jahnke+2024
Off-axis chief-ray angle onto NISP FPA 0.8357° to M1 axis design value Jahnke+2024
Telescope F-ratio (input to NISP) F/20.4 → NISP F/10.4 spec Jahnke+2024
Wavefront error criterion Maréchal: WFE RMS < λ/14 (diffraction-limited) requirement Jahnke+2024
Orbit Sun–Earth L2 spec Jahnke+2024

2. NISP instrument — top-level

Item Value Type Source
FOV ~0.5–0.57 deg² (0.7 deg² per DOCX) spec (values differ slightly between sources — 0.57 deg² Jahnke+2024 is authoritative) Jahnke+2024 / DOCX
Plate scale 0.3″/pix spec Jahnke+2024
FPA 4×4 H2RG (HgCdTe), 2040×2040 science px + 4-px reference border spec Jahnke+2024
Pixel pitch 18 µm measured Jahnke+2024
Detector operating temp ~95 K spec/measured Jahnke+2024
Detector cutoff wavelength 2.3 µm (vs 2.5 µm for JWST NIRCam) spec Jahnke+2024
Volume 100×50×50 cm spec Jahnke+2024
Mass budget (main structure) 37 kg allocation spec Jahnke+2024
Total mass max 155 kg; actual 85.3 kg (instrument) + 40.7 kg (warm electronics) spec / measured Jahnke+2024
Power max 200 W spec Jahnke+2024
First eigenfrequency > 80 Hz target requirement Jahnke+2024
Thermo-mechanical stability (optics) < 0.3 K over 6 yr requirement Jahnke+2024
Detector thermal stability ≤ 4 mK over ~1200 s (req); measured 1 mK RMS (FPA), 2 mK RMS (optics) in PV spec vs. measured Jahnke+2024
Downlink data rate allocation 290 Gbit/day; measured ~31 ± 3 GB/day (20 ROS × 4 dithers) ≈ 248 Gbit/day spec vs. measured Jahnke+2024
Radiator temps ~130 K (structure/optics), ~95 K (detectors) design Jahnke+2024
Thermal env. (instrument cavity) 130–135 K measured Jahnke+2024
NI-CU illumination angle ~12° (axis to FPA vs FPA normal) design Jahnke+2024

3. NISP-P photometric passbands (Table 1, Jahnke+2024, from Schirmer+2022)

Filter 50% cut-on [nm] 50% cut-off [nm] centre [nm] σ50 (centre/corner) [nm] σcen [nm]
YE 949.6 1212.3 1080.9 0.8/0.8 0.6
JE 1167.6 1567.0 1367.3 0.8/0.9 0.6
HE 1521.5 2021.4 1771.4 0.8/0.9 0.6

Out-of-band blocking factor: in-band 10⁻⁴; out-of-NISP-range 10⁻⁵–10⁻⁹. Photometric contamination: ≤2 mmag (typ. 0.2 mmag). — all measured.

4. Grisms (Table 2, Jahnke+2024)

Parameter RGS000/180 RGS270 BGS000
FWHM bandpass [nm] 1206–1892 (same) 926–1366
Prism angle A 2.145° ± 30″ 1.77° ± 30″
Groove height H [µm] 3.16 ± 0.08 2.25 ± 0.1
Blaze angle β 2.49° 2.48° 1.94°
Groove pitch [µm] 72.55 72.96 66.22
Groove density [mm⁻¹] 13.75 13.7 15.1
0th-order transmission 2.4% 2.3% 2.0%
1st-order transmission 84.7% 84.3% 84.2%
dλ/dx [nm/pix] +1.372 (RGS000), −1.372 (RGS180) 1.239
R (resolving power) > 480 (RGE) > 400 (BGE)

All measured (ground). Requirement was R ≥ 380 (BGE)/R ≥ 480 (RGE per some sections — check consistency: overview §2 states R ≥ 380 generically as requirement; Table 2/§3.4 gives measured R>480 RGE, R>400 BGE — the measured values exceed requirement).

Redshift-error requirement: σ(z) < 0.001(1+z) for Hα, FWHM 0.5″ source, 3.5σ flux limit ≤2×10⁻¹⁶ erg cm⁻² s⁻¹ — specification, consistent with Table 5 limiting sensitivity ~2×10⁻¹⁶ (measured, in-flight initial estimate).

Grism material: Suprasil 3001, OH+metallic impurities <1 ppm (spec).

Grism WFE metrology (2303.09130v1, Table 1 — LAM FM test campaign, measured vs. spec)

  • Transmitted WFE spec < 20 nm RMS @633 nm → measured 10–12 nm RMS (compliant, all 4 FM units)
  • Grating surface RMSi spec <30 nm RMS → measured 25.5–27 nm RMS (RGS000/180/270, compliant); BGS000 37.4 nm RMS (non-compliant)
  • Filter surface RMSi spec <15 nm RMS → measured 3–10.5 nm RMS (compliant, all units)
  • Focus defocus spec ±0.5 fringe → BGS000 0.61 fr (non-compliant); others compliant (0.05–0.34 fr)
  • Curvature-after-gluing spec ≤5 fr shift → RGS000, RGS180 non-compliant (5.23–8.4 fr); RGS270, BGS000 compliant (4.18–4.63 fr)
  • Overall: efficiency >70% on bandpass, WFE on surfaces <30 nm RMS (summary claim, slightly looser than per-unit table)
  • Vibration qualification: withstood up to 11.6 g RMS random; cryo-vac test to 130 K

Discrepancy note: 2303.09130v1 states spectral transmission requirement "better than 65%," achieved >70%; Jahnke+2024 gives measured 1st-order transmission 84–85%. Both consistent (different measurement stage: component-level vs. as-integrated FM), 2405.13493v1 more authoritative as later, instrument-level, published account.

5. FPA / detector chain (Table 3 & 4, Jahnke+2024 — measured, CPPM/IP2I/LAM campaigns)

  • QE (median over 16 SCA), accuracy ±5% (absolute, Waczynski+2016): YE 88–96%, JE 93–98%, HE 93–99%
  • Read noise: Spectro mode 7.7–9.2 e⁻; Photo mode 5.6–6.7 e⁻ (medians per SCA)
  • Disconnected pixels: 135–3223 per detector (missing/faulty indium bumps)
  • Dark current: ~0.02 e⁻ s⁻¹ pixel⁻¹ (measured)
  • Cross-talk amplitude: ~0.001% (measured, ground)
  • IPC central-pixel loss: 2.87 ± 0.01% (Le Graët+2022, measured)
  • Baseline pedestal: ~5.5 kADU (reference px), ~10 kADU (science px); temp. dependence ~−120 ADU/K (measured)
  • Exposure synchronization across 16 detectors: <10 ns (spec, achieved)
  • QE 5th-percentile spectral curve: Fig. 12 (measured at NASA JPL)

6. PSF (in-flight, Table 5, Jahnke+2024 — "initial in-flight estimates," measured)

Filter rEE50 rEE80 FWHM ZP [AB] Lim. sens.
YE 0.22″ 0.37″ 0.35″ 24.95 24.6 mag (5σ)
JE 0.24″ 0.45″ 0.34″ 25.19 24.6 mag
HE 0.27″ 0.55″ 0.35″ 25.11 24.5 mag
BGE 0.21″ N.A.
RGE 0.24″ ~2×10⁻¹⁶ erg s⁻¹cm⁻¹ (3.5σ, 2×13.4 Å width)

Range quoted in text: rEE50 0.21″–0.27″, rEE80 0.37″–0.55″ across bands.

Optical-only (lab, 960 nm, NI-OA, pre-detector) EE: ~2/3 energy within R=0.5 px — measured, ideal diffraction-limited case only few % better.

Ground grism PSF (2506.08378v2, measured, no telescope PSF included)

  • EE50 ≈ 0.6 × requirement (<0.3″ at 1500 nm) → i.e., measured EE50 well inside spec
  • Rotational misalignment tolerance tested: ±4°, no measurable EE50/EE80 change
  • These ground values exclude telescope contribution — not directly comparable to in-flight Table 5 numbers without added telescope PSF/jitter terms.

7. In-flight PSF broadening budget (Jahnke+2024, reasoning + measured contributions)

Relative to lab optical PSF at 960 nm: - YE central λ 1081 nm → ~13% larger PSF (diffraction scaling, λ-driven) - Pointing jitter: ~35 mas (measured, spacecraft) - IPC: broadens further (see §6 above, 2.87% central-pixel effect) - BFE: additional broadening, flux-dependent (brighter stars more affected) — qualitative in this paper, no BFE amplitude number given here.


Inconsistency flagged: FOV value differs (0.57 deg² Jahnke+2024 vs. 0.7 deg² in the DOCX proposal) — the peer-reviewed Jahnke+2024 number is authoritative; the DOCX is a project-internal summary document, lower priority per source hierarchy.

Gap: No BFE (brighter-fatter effect) magnitude, no explicit VIS-instrument quantitative table, found in the provided documents — VIS specs mentioned only qualitatively (530–920 nm passband) via citation to Cropper et al./Euclid Collaboration: Cropper et al. 2024, not itself in the library.